• Welcome aboard HomebuiltAirplanes.com, your destination for connecting with a thriving community of more than 10,000 active members, all passionate about home-built aviation. Dive into our comprehensive repository of knowledge, exchange technical insights, arrange get-togethers, and trade aircrafts/parts with like-minded enthusiasts. Unearth a wide-ranging collection of general and kit plane aviation subjects, enriched with engaging imagery, in-depth technical manuals, and rare archives.

    For a nominal fee of $99.99/year or $12.99/month, you can immerse yourself in this dynamic community and unparalleled treasure-trove of aviation knowledge.

    Embark on your journey now!

    Click Here to Become a Premium Member and Experience Homebuilt Airplanes to the Fullest!

Lifting Body- Food for Thought, or Indigestion?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

tls258

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
285
One aspect of the Sonex is its "ugly" fuselage shape, which incorporates a lifting body design. The shape of the fuselage is an airfoil that contributes lift. "What if" the Sonerai cowl and turtle were streamlined into more of a lifting body shape. Would that just be too ugly? Vincent Burnelli designed a cargo/passenger plane that first flew in 1944 and was retired from passenger service in 1964. It's performance was similar to the DC-3 but could carry 2,000# more and had a TO distance of 650 ft. But, it was ugly. The Bellanca Cruiseair also incorporates some lifting body design.
Image result for sonex aircraft
Burnelli CBY-3 Loadmaster
Image result for Bellanca Cruisair,
 
Back
Top